Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Felis maxima was named by Scott and Osborn (1890). It is a 3D body fossil.
It was corrected as Felis maximus by Hay (1902).
It was corrected as Felis maximus by Hay (1902).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1890 | Felis maxima Scott and Osborn p. 70 fig. 4 |
1902 | Felis maximus Hay p. 783 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Felis maximus Scott and Osborn 1890
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: f = family, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
References: Carroll 1988, Nowak 1991, Hendy et al. 2009, Ji et al. 2002, Lillegraven 1979 |
Age range: base of the Barstovian to the top of the Clarendonian or 16.30000 to 9.40000 Ma
Collections: one only
Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
---|---|---|---|
Barstovian - Clarendonian | USA (Nebraska) | Felis maxima (230906) |