Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Simocetidae

Mammalia - Cetacea - Simocetidae

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2002Simocetidae Fordyce
2005Simocetidae Gingerich p. 237 figs. Table 15.1
2007Simocetidae Bianucci and Landini p. 45 figs. Table 2.1
2008Simocetidae Uhen p. 445 figs. Table 1
2008Simocetidae Uhen et al. p. 570
2009Simocetidae Rice p. 235 figs. Table 1
2010Simocetidae Fitzgerald p. 370 figs. Table 1
2015Simocetidae Boessenecker and Fordyce figs. Table 1
2016Simocetidae Marx et al. p. 117
2017Simocetidae Berta p. 160
2023Simocetidae Boessenecker and Geisler p. 152
2023Simocetidae Velez-Juarbe p. 4

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
RankNameAuthor
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Euungulata
Artiodactylamorpha
Artiodactyla()
Whippomorpha
orderCetacea
Pelagiceti
Neoceti
suborderOdontoceti
Amblyoccipita
familySimocetidae
familySimocetidae

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Fm. Simocetidae Fordyce 2002
show all | hide all
G. †Olympicetus Vélez-Juarbe 2017
hide
Olympicetus avitus Vélez-Juarbe 2017
Olympicetus thalassodon Velez-Juarbe 2023
G. †Simocetus Fordyce 2002
hide
Simocetus rayi Fordyce 2002
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
M. D. Uhen et al. 2008The extinct family Simocetidae is based on Simocetus emlongi Fordyce 2002, known from a skull, mandible and a few postcranial fragments of early Oligocene age from Oregon. Although the skull is of archaic (“agorophiid”) grade, it shows some highly specialized features: toothless premaxillae, apex of rostrum dorsoventrally thin with shallow mesorostral groove, and anterior of rostrum and mandible downturned. When the species was described, its broader relationships were uncertain. Fordyce now considers that the toothless premaxillae and elongate conical pterygoid hamulus place Simocetus and Simocetidae closer to Eurhinodelphinidae than to other odontocetes.
J. Velez-Juarbe 2023Stem odontocetes displaying a mosaic of plesiomorphic and derived characters that sets them apart from other basal odontocetes, particularly
the Xenorophidae, Patriocetidae and Agorophiidae. Characterized by the following unambiguous synapomorphies: seven to eight teeth completely enclosed by the maxilla (c.25[1]); lack of a rostral basin (c.66[0]), differing from most xenorophids which have a well-defined basin; posteriormost edge of nasals in line with the anterior half
of the supraorbital processes (c.123[1]); supraoccipital at about the same level as the nasals (c.129[1]), differing from xenorophids where the supraoccipital is higher; floor
of squamosal fossa thickens posteriorly (c.149[1]); distal end of postglenoid process is anteroposteriorly wide (c.152[2]); long and subconical hamular process of the pterygoid (c.173[1]); hamular processes unkeeled (c.174[0]); hamular processes extending to a point in line with the middle of the zygomatic processes (c.175[3]); cranial hiatus constricted by medial projection of the parietal (c.184[2]); absent to poorly defined rectus capitus anticus muscle fossa (c.193[0]), differing from the well-defined fossa of xenorophids; posteroventral end of basioccipital crest forming a posteriorly oriented flange (c.194[2]); anterior process of periotic with well-defined fossa for contact with tympanic (c.210[3]); lateral tuberosity of periotic forming a bulbous prominence lateral to mallear fossa (c.212[1]); tegmen tympani at the base of the anterior process unexcavated (c.232[0]), differing from the excavated surface in xenorophids; articular surface of the posterior process of periotic is smooth (c.242[0]) and concave (c.243[0]); and, posterolateral sulcus of premaxilla deeply entrenched (c.310[1]).
Additional characters present in simocetids include: rostrum fairly wide (c.7[1]; shared with Ashleycetus planicapitis Sanders & Geisler, 2015, Agorophius pygmaeus (Müller, 1849), and Ankylorhiza tiedemani (Allen, 1887)); palatine/maxilla suture anteriorly bowed (21[0]; shared with Patriocetus kazakhstanicus Dubrovo & Sanders, 2000); lacrimal restricted to below the supraorbital process of frontal (c.52[0]; shared with A. planicapitis, P. kazakhstanicus and An. tiedemani); relatively small ventral (orbital) exposure of
the lacrimal (c.56[0]; shared with A. planicapitis, Archaeodelphis patrius Allen, 1921,
and P. kazakhstanicus); postorbital process of frontal relatively long and oriented posterolaterally and ventrally (c.62[0]; shared with A. planicapitis, Mirocetus riabinini Mchedlidze, 1970 and P. kazakhstanicus); presence of a long posterolateral sulcus extending from the premaxillary foramen (c.73[2]; shared with A. planicapitis); maxillae only partially covering supraorbital processes (c.77[1]; shared with A. planicapitis and Ar. patrius); frontals slightly lower than nasals (c.125[0]; shared with Cotylocara macei Geisler, Colbert & Carew, 2014); intertemporal region with an ovoid cross section (c.137[1]; shared with A. planicapitis, Echovenator sandersi Churchill et al., 2016, and C. macei); anterior end of supraoccipital is semicircular (c.153[1]; shared with P. kazakhstanicus); occipital shield with distinct sagittal crest (= external occipital crest, sensu Mead & Fordyce, 2009) (c.156[1]; shared with Albertocetus meffordorum Uhen, 2008, P. kazakhstanicus, Ag. pygmaeus, and An. tiedemani); a nearly transverse pterygoid-palatine suture (c.163[1]; shared with Ar. patrius); anterior process of periotic short (c.204[2]; shared with C. macei).
Measurements
No measurements are available
Composition: hydroxyapatitesubo
Form: roller-shapedo
Ontogeny: modification of partso
Environment: marine, freshwatersubo
Locomotion: actively mobileo
Life habit: aquatico
Depth habitat: surfaceo
Diet: carnivoresubo
Reproduction: viviparoussubo
Created: 2005-03-06 14:21:39
Modified: 2005-09-22 15:42:08
Source: subo = suborder, o = order
Reference: Uhen 2004

Age range: base of the Rupelian to the top of the Chattian or 33.90000 to 23.03000 Ma

Collections (4 total)


Time interval Ma Country or state Original ID and collection number
Rupelian33.9 - 28.1USA (Oregon) Simocetus rayi (45669)
Rupelian33.9 - 28.1USA (Washington) Simocetidae indet., Olympicetus sp., Odontoceti indet. (58964)
Rupelian - Chattian33.9 - 23.03USA (Washington) Olympicetus thalassodon (230475)
Chattian28.1 - 23.03USA (Washington) Olympicetus avitus (45809)