| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Funeralaspis
Taxonomy
Funeralaspis was named by Adrain and Pérez-Peris (2023). Its type is Funeralaspis deathvalleyensis.
It was assigned to Odontopleurinae by Adrain and Pérez-Peris (2023).
It was assigned to Odontopleurinae by Adrain and Pérez-Peris (2023).
Species
F. deathvalleyensis (type species)
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2023 | Funeralaspis Adrain and Pérez-Peris p. 510 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Funeralaspis Adrain and Pérez-Peris 2023
show all | hide all
†Funeralaspis deathvalleyensis Adrain and Pérez-Peris 2023
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| J. M. Adrain and F. Pérez-Peris 2023 | ✫ ☎ ✆✔ ✂✠✯ ✂ ✦ ✂✄☎ ✠ ✞✠ ✄✝ ✡ ✯ ✂✞✔ ✂ ✝✯ ☎ ✮ ✄✡ ✄✄✠ ✄✝✝ ☛☞ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✹✠☎✔ ✄☎ ✞ ✞✔ ☎ ✛✔ ✆✻✡ ✔ ✂✦✻ ✝ ✄✆✔ ✴✯ ✂ ✮✂✄☎✻ ✝ ✄ ✂✺ ✛ ✦✻✝ ✱✆✻ ✂✔✏✩✯ ✛ ✆ ✞✯ ✂✛ ✄✝ ✦✂✄☎✠ ✞✠ ✄✝ ✛✻ ✂✹✄ ✦✔ ✛ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✞✔☎ ✛✔ ✛ ✦✻✝ ✱ ✆✻ ✂✔ ✯ ✹ ✹✠☎✔ ✄☎ ✞ ✩✔ ✞✠✻ ✩ ✆✻✡ ✔ ✂✦✝✔ ✛✏ ✔ ☛✔ ✄☎ ✞ ✱✄✝ ✱✔✡ ✂✄✝ ✝✯✡ ✔ ✛✔ ✆ ✶✔ ✂☛✱✯ ✛ ✆✔ ✂✠✯ ✂✝ ☛☞ ✂✔ ✄ ✂ ✯ ✹ ✱ ✄✝ ✱✔ ✡ ✂✄✝ ✝✯ ✡✔ ☎ ✔ ✄ ✂✝ ☛ ✄✝✠ ✮☎ ✔ ✞ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✄☎ ✆✔ ✂✠✯ ✂ ✯ ✹ ✩✔ ✞✠ ✄☎ ✯ ✦✦✠ ✱✠ ✆✄✝ ☎✯ ✞✔ ✏ ✹✠✄ ✠ ✮✔☎ ✄✝ ✹✠✔✝ ✞ ✯ ☎ ✱✯ ✛ ✆✔ ✂✠✯ ✂✱✂✯ ✒✔ ✦✆✠✯☎ ✛ ✱ ✂✔ ✛✔ ☎ ✆ ✄ ✛ ✯ ☎✝ ☛ ✄ ✆✠☎ ☛ ✛ ✆✂✠ ✱✏ ✩✔ ✞✠ ✄☎ ✯ ✦ ✦✠ ✱✠ ✆ ✄✝ ✝✯ ✡✔ ✝ ✄✂✮✔☞ ✔ ✝✔ ✶✄ ✆✔ ✞✏ ✱✄✠ ✂ ✯ ✹ ✦✝✯ ✛✔ ✝ ☛ ✛ ✱✄ ✦✔ ✞☞ ✛✧✯ ✂✆ ✯ ✦✦✠ ✱✠ ✆✄✝✛ ✱✠☎ ✔ ✛☞ ☎✯ ✆ ✞✠ ✶✔ ✂✮✠☎ ✮ ✱✯ ✛ ✆✔ ✂✯✝ ✄✆✔ ✂✄✝✝ ☛☞ ✂✻ ☎☎ ✠☎ ✮☞ ✠☎ ✩✯ ✛ ✆ ✛ ✱✔ ✦✠ ✩✔ ☎ ✛☞ ✔✄ ✄✦ ✆✝ ☛ ✱✯ ✛ ✆✔ ✂✠✯ ✂✝ ☛✏ ✞✯✻ ✡✝ ✻ ✂✔ ✡ ✔☎ ✔ ✄ ✆✧ ✼ ✶✔ ✂☛✝✯ ☎ ✮ ✛ ✄ ✮✠ ✆✆ ✄✝✝ ☛✏ ✝✠✡ ✂✠ ✮✔ ☎ ✄✝ ✹✠✔✝ ✞ ✶✔ ✂☛ ✡ ✂✯ ✄✞☞ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✩✔ ✞✠ ✻ ✩ ✛✠✿ ✔ ✞ ✆✻✡ ✔ ✂✦✝✔ ✛ ✂✔ ✛✆ ✂✠ ✦✆✔ ✞ ✆✯ ✂✯ ✻ ✮✧✝ ☛ ✆✧✔ ✄ ✞✄✄ ✠ ✄✝ ✧ ✄✝ ✹✏posterior border forming a sharp angle with base of the genal spine, nearly 90 degrees, ranging from slightly acute✆✯ ✛✝✠ ✮✧ ✆✝ ☛ ✯✡ ✆✻ ✛✔ ✏ ✝✠ ✡ ✂✠ ✮✔☎ ✄✝ ✝ ✄✆✔ ✂✄✝ ✡✯ ✂✞✔ ✂ ✆☛ ✱✠ ✦ ✄✝✝ ☛ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✌✌ ✡ ✯ ✂✞✔ ✂ ✛ ✱✠☎✔ ✛☞ ✡ ✯ ✂✞✔ ✂ ✛ ✱✠☎✔ ✛ ✂✔ ✛ ✆✂✠ ✦✆✔ ✞ ✆✯ ✝ ✄ ✆✔ ✂✄✝ ✡ ✯ ✂✞✔ ✂✄☎ ✞ ☎ ✯ ✆ ✱✂✔ ✛✔☎ ✆ ✯☎ ✡ ✄✛ ✄✝ ✱ ✄ ✂✆ ✯ ✹ ✮✔☎ ✄✝ ✛ ✱✠☎✔ ✏ ✮✔ ☎ ✄✝ ✛ ✱✠☎ ✔ ✄✡ ✯✻ ✆ ✄✛ ✝✯☎ ✮ ✄✛ ✩✄✠☎ ✡ ✯ ✞ ☛ ✯ ✹ ✝✠✡ ✂✠ ✮✔ ☎ ✄ ✄☎ ✞ ✛✝✔☎ ✞✔ ✂✏hypostome relatively narrow (about 1.25 times as wide as long), with ventral sculpture of dense, relatively small✆✻ ✡✔ ✂✦✝ ✔ ✛✏ ✆✧ ✯ ✂✄ ✦✠ ✦ ✛✔ ✮ ✩✔ ☎ ✆ ✛ ✔ ✄✦✧ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✄ ✱✄✠ ✂ ✯ ✹ ✆✻ ✡✔ ✂✦✝✔ ✛ ✯☎ ✆✧ ✔ ✄✄✠ ✄✝ ✂✠☎ ✮ ✄☎ ✞ ✄ ✱ ✂✯ ✩✠☎ ✔☎ ✆ ✆✻✡ ✔ ✂✦✝✔ ✄✆ ✆✧ ✔ ✡ ✄ ✛✔ ✯ ✹✔ ✄✦✧ ✱✯ ✛ ✆✔ ✂✠✯ ✂ ✱✝✔ ✻ ✂✄✝ ✛ ✱✠☎✔ ☞ ✂✔ ✩ ✄✠☎ ✞✔ ✂ ✯ ✹ ✛ ✦✻ ✝ ✱✆✻ ✂✔ ✯ ✹ ✩✻ ✦✧ ✹✠☎ ✔ ✂ ✆✻✡ ✔ ✂✦✝✔ ✛✏ ✱ ☛✮✠ ✞✠ ✻ ✩ ✁ ✠ ✆✧ ✆✁✯ ✄✄✠ ✄✝ ✂✠☎ ✮ ✛ ✔ ✄ ✦✧with a pair of prominent spines, four medial border spines between the major spines, and two pairs of border spines✝ ✄ ✆✔ ✂✄✝ ✆✯ ✆✧ ✔ ✩ ✄✒✯ ✂ ✛ ✱✠☎✔ ✛✏ ✩✄✒✯ ✂ ✛ ✱✠ ☎✔ ✛ ✦✯☎ ✛✠ ✞✔ ✂✄✡ ✝ ☛ ✝✯ ☎ ✮✔ ✂ ✆✧ ✄☎ ✯ ✆✧✔ ✂ ✛✱✠☎ ✔ ✛✏ ✄✱ ✄ ✂✆ ✹✂✯ ✩ ✱✂✯ ✩✠☎✔ ☎ ✆ ✆✻ ✡✔ ✂✦✝ ✔ ✯☎pleural region in front of second pair of pygidial spines, prominent tubercle at base of major spine and one or two slightly smaller tubercles distally on the major spine, sculpture of dense small tubercles on all dorsal aspects exceptthe articulating half-ring. |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Source: f = family, c = class | |||||
| References: Hendy 2009, Aberhan et al. 2004 | |||||